Category Archives: Deaflympics

IPC refutes Deaf comments about 2012 Paralympics

Posted on by
Reply

There was an interesting article by Joel Hammer on the BBC Sports website this week discussing the accessibility of the 2012 Paralympics in relation to Deaf spectators and athletes.

The headline ran with Craig Crowley’s comment that some people were made to feel like ‘second-class’ citizens when the attended or participated in the 2012 Paralympics.

The IPC responded on the defensive as an IPC spokesperson “we refute any allegation.”

The IPC refuse to accept the comment that deaf people felt like ‘second-class’ citizens because “absolutely no concerns were expressed to the IPC from deaf athletes or spectators before, during or after London 2012.” and on that basis no deaf people were made to feel like second-class citizens “at the best Paralympic Games ever.”

This is a rather unfortunate response from the IPC, especially as Craig Crowley was diplomatic in in comments on the BBC Sports Hour programme because he did commend the efforts that the organisers had made to improve communication and accessibility but they were still not ‘offered on a full basis’. Crowley justified his comments because in his role as president of the ICSD, he had the opportunity to tour the athletes village and attend some events and in his conversations with people he received feedback that prompted him to suggest that people felt treated like second-class citizens.

Is the IPC really not willing to accept criticism ?

According to their spokesperson they have never received any complains – and so according to them, Crowley is wrong. But the facts speak for themselves – people have spoken to Crowley and shared their experiences with him. I have also gathered comments from others who were also at the Games – athletes, officials and volunteers which suggest that if the ICSD is going to be able to make any progress in discussing the possibility of agreeing to have Deaflympic athletes and sports in the Paralympics, then they really have got their work cut out because it would appear, from the response we read this week, that the IPC are going to be difficult to negotiate with.

LOCOG themselves published a report on the accessibility of the Olympics and Paralympics in 2012, it makes interesting and extremely positive reading. Whilst it does not reveal any negative criticism, the recommendations in the report do suggest that there were things that were not ideal and thus the report has listed ways in which future world class event organisers can accommodate and include spectators to avoid treating them as ‘second-class’.

In my role at UK Deaf Sport am looking forward to joining my colleagues and discussing matters of accessibility and inclusion with representatives of the British Paralympic Association as soon as possible in order that we can help them improve things for deaf athletes who already qualify to compete under IPC classifications. Our discussions will be constructive, but they will also be frank and at times uncomfortable. They will include testimonials from athletes, volunteers and officials who were at the 2012 Paralympics and the recommendations of the LOCOG report. I am confident that we can work collaboratively for the benefit of deaf people in sport.

Does this mean that we will be asking for Deaflympic athletes to be included in future Paralympic Games ? Realistically, it is not a matter than can be resolved and agreed at one meeting. The politics and structures of the Olympic family are contrived and will take time. Through these discussions and meetings we will all be able to look to the future possibilities and determine what can be achieved in the best interest of deaf people in sport.

It is rather difficult to explain everything here on the blog. For more information and in-depth discussions about the relationships between the ICSD, IPC and IOC and the issues that will need to be covered in terms of potentially taking the ICSD back into the IPC and entering athletes into the Paralympics under a Deaf classification, you can read Same Spirit Different Team a new book, which will be released for sale shortly. You can order your copy here.

Would you like to contribute to our discussions with the IPC and BPA ? Did you attend the 2012 Paralympics as a spectator, athlete or official ? You are welcome to share your comments here both or you can email in confidence to me at my UKDS email sharrison@ukdeafsport.org.uk.

Let’s do the right thing.

The BBC asks questions about the Deaflympics

Posted on by
Reply

As Russia announced that they will be hosting the 2015 Winter Deaflympics, the BBC interviewed a discussion with former ICSD President Craig Crowley and Andy Palmer, Deputy Editor of the deaf news website The Limping Chicken.

A transcript of the radio discussion is available

They discussed:

  • The importance in difference between the Deaflympics and the Paralympics and the reason for separate games.
  • The big question : Are we Deaf or Disabled?
  • The relationship between the ICSD and the IPC and the pros and cons.
  • The concerns about ‘time running out for Deaf sport’ if it does not deal with the question about Deaflympics and Paralympics.

As with many other important questions like this, there is never enough time in a radio show to really cover everything in detail. Fortunately, the latest book on the Deaflympics,  Same Spirit Different Team  allows you to read up further on the topics raised in the show.

Image

The book is proving popular in the UK and also overseas. International readers have been having difficulty placing orders over the internet but fortunately the publishers have now been able to deal with the technical issues involved and they hope that the problem has now been solved.

The book is available to pre-order

 

Deaflympics Winter Games 2015 are to go ahead.

Posted on by
Reply

We congratulate ICSD on their success to confirm that the Russian Government has pledged it;s support for the next Deaflympic Winter Games to take place from February 27 to March 7, 2015 in Khanty-Mansiysk.

Image

Picture – Khanty-Mansiysk, is located in an oil-rich regions of Russia

Presentation Meeting 14th January – ICSD President Rukhledev in his role as Honourary President of the Russian Committee of Deaf Sports and Mrs Komarova, Governor of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Area-Yugra made presentations to the committee Russian international sports competitions which comes under the chair of the Deputy prime Minister of Russia Mr Kozak.

It is reassuring to see ICSD, at the very least, confirming that there is national and local government support for Deaflympic events. The finer details of the agreement are not known at this time as the Russian Committee of Deaf Sports, who are the event host will send all the necessary supporting documents to ICSD as due process within a couple of weeks.

Proposed events in 2015 – Athletes and their coaches can now prepare for the following events cross-country skiing, snowboarding, curling alpine skiing and ice hockey – again all this will be confirmed by ICSD in due course.  If you are not already affiliated to a national Deaflympic team and you wish to be considered for any of the events, you can contact you national deaf sports organisation. If you are eligible to represent Great Britain you can contact the UKDS National Talent Officer.

There was some concern about the ICSD Presidents potential conflict of interests whilst still holding a post within the Russian Deaf Sports Association. It has been clarified that he holds an Honorary Presidential role which suggests that he does not have any direct operational involvement in the RSDA. Mr Alexander Romantsov is President of the RSDA.

Historically, the Deaflympic Games has enjoyed very little economic and media support – and this is especially so for the less well-known Winter Deaflympics. It will be interesting to see if the relationships between the Russian Committee of Deaf Sports, its government and the Regional Governors office can emulate the City of Taipei and their coverage of the 2009 Summer Deaflympics.

The role of governments, the media and other agencies and the promotion of the Summer and Winter Deaflympics can be found in a new book due to be released in a few weeks. Same Spirit Different Team, to be published by AD Books.

The Retreat to Moscow

Posted on by
Reply

The contracts of the full -time staff at ICSD have just been terminated. Image

Mark Cooper (CEO) and Roanna Simmons (Operations Manager) have lost their jobs because the ICSD claims its financial situation is in decline.

Despite announcing last October, that they were planning to relocate to Switzerland in order to have ‘neighbourly’ contact with the IOC, they have now retreated to Moscow. the ICSD has now decamped to an office within the National Association of the Deaf of the Russian Federation and Mr Dmitry Rebrov, who works at the National Association has been given a temporary appointment to replace Cooper. These changes are subject to approval of the ICSD Executive Committee.

The ICSD apparently held a meeting with the Russian Federation government on January 14th to seek their final approval for the 18th Winter Deaflympics in Khanty-Mansiysk 2015. So far, no announcements have been made. There is speculation that there will be a repeat of the 2011 cancellation of the Winter Deaflympics when the event organiser was subsequently imprisoned for misappropriation of funds.

The world sports community is about to see the publication of a new book on the Deaflympics that discusses the importance of strong  leadership within the ICSD, the Deaflympic Movement and its relationships with the IOC/IPC and national committees, it also argues that Deaf sport must have a effective working relationship with non-deaf sports organisations and individuals.

You can now order you copy of Same Spirit Different Team from the publishers.

 

 

 

 

Are you still not convinced about Deaf sport?

Posted on by
2

Deaf sport, most people don’t understand why its needed.

Watch this video.

Now what would you say ?   Are you convinced?

Who said we were Paralympians?

Posted on by
Reply

Ian Herbert of The Independent has come up with his own alternative of the BBC Sports personality of the Year Award.

Whilst he has correctly and justifiably recognised the courageous and inspiring exploits of Gerry Hughes and his solo-circumnavigation of the globe this year he has unfortunately succumbed to the urban myth that Gerry is a Paralympic athlete.

The Deaf community knows that this is the incorrect title because there is no category for Deaf athletes in the Paralympics and that the Deaflympics are recognised by the IOC and the IPC as the equivalent event to the Paralympics.

So why does the media continue to make the same mistake over and over? One of the reasons for this is that the IOC and the IPC have a monopoly on ‘Disability Sport’ that gave birth to the urban myth of Deaf sport and the Paralympics in the ‘early days’ when they self-appointed themselves as guardians of all sport for disabled people. Over the last couple of decades, when the media has incorrectly attributed Deaf athletes to the Paralympics, nobody has corrected them.

Whose fault is that? Who should be scanning the media to make sure that the urban myth is not given life-blood? Should it be the ICSD and its national representatives? The problem is – resources – and motivation. Firstly, the IOC has been supporting the IPC with millions of dollars each year to enable them to appoint staff and promote the Paralympics. the ICSD cannot compete with this because the IOC who, for some unknown reason has decided that despite recognising the Deaflympics as an event as equal in stature to the Paralympics only provides a very small amount of funds.

The second problem for this, partly lies at the door of Deaf sport itself because its own motivation has been to continue to declare that Deaf people are not disabled. When the IPC was established, it was done so to govern disability sport under the IOC. The CISS agreed be a founder of the IPC on condition that it was able to continue to organise the World Games for the Deaf, which at the time was recognised as an Olympic -status event by the IOC. Almost immediately,  national organisations began to create problems for Deaf sport by not recognising the World games for the Deaf. The  motivation behind the establishment of the IPC for the majority of its members, was to get the fledgling Paralympics accepted by the IOC. They saw it as essential that the CISS should join them to give their cause credence.

For a few short years, the IPC was the governor of ‘disability sport’. But noting was done at the beginning to make sure that people respected the status of the World games for the Deaf and as a consequence the CISS and now the ICSD has been struggling.

In retrospect, when it withdrew from the IPC, the CISS should have insisted that the IOC and IPC make a declaration that the IPC was no longer the overall governor of Disability Sport, things might have turned out differently. Eventually, the IPC dropped the ‘disabled governance’ mantle and now correctly declare themselves to be the ‘global governing body of the Paralympic Movement”.

But this message has not been getting through to the media and the public at large. Deaf sport needs volunteers to come forwards and help to raise the media profile of the Deaflympic Movement.

If you are media savvy, media motivated and want to make a contribution to society – please get in touch with me at UK Deaf Sport as we really could do with your help to raise the media profile of the Deaflympic Movement here in the UK and overseas.

Ooops! I have made a mistake ! We not allowed to use derivatives of the word Deaflympic (Deaflympic Movement, Deaflympian, National Deaflympic Committee etc). The IOC only allows us to use the term Deaflympic in the title of the event itself…

That is why Ian Herbert should recognise Gerry Hughes as “The Disabled Sports Personality of 2013”

 

 

Are We Going to the Paralympics?

Posted on by
Reply

Since the media misquoted IPC president Sir Philip Craven recently over reports that Deaf sports would be in the Tokyo 2020 Paralympics I have been asked what is going on.

When i first read Craven’s comments I was doubtful about the accuracy of the report because those of us participating in international deaf sports politics know that the relationship between the IPC and the ICSD has not developed to the point where such agreements would be possible. 

The IOC recognises the Deaflympics as an event of equal status to the Paralympics. However, they have chosen, to put all their support, resources and energies behind the Paralympics and since 2001 the IOC and IPC have jointly organised their events together. This has meant millions of dollars from the IOC going into the IPC budget whilst a few thousands has been given to the ICSD.

A new book ‘Same Spirit, Different Team – The Politicalisation of the Deaflympics‘ will be available soon and will throw some light on the complex issues within the Olympic family of events, organisations and people. This book will be available from AD Books you can register for your copy here.Image

English translation of Interview with Valery Rukhledev

Posted on by
Reply

Following on from our last post, wondering what the new ICSD President has planned for the future of the Deaflympics, we have created a link to the SportsMX interview with Valery Rukhledev here.

The video does not have subtitles to give accessibility so this blog will provide a very brief written translation of the new ICSD presidents goals for the future of ICSD and Deaf sport. We must bear in mind that there are many issues that Dr Rukhledev could have spoken about, but he was limited to a video interview.

In his first year he plans to selected the very best possible Technical Directors for each sport, people with extensive experience of their sports in order to improve the organisation of  deaf sports further.

2014 marks the 90th Anniversary of the founding of the Deaflympic Movement and Rukhledev wants to celebrate this with the publication of a book that gives a very detailed history of the Deaflympics from 1924 – 2013.

For the long term, he also wants to base the ICSD office in Switzerland in order that ICSD can increase face to face communications with the IOC. In the past, meetings have been limited because of the costs of making arrangements to travel and timing of meetings due to ICSD offices being elsewhere (USA and UK). Being ‘local’ to the IOC, he hopes that this will increase the visibility of ICSD’s work to the attention of the IOC.

By continuing the dialogue with the IOC, the plan is for the Deaflympics to be supported on a par with the Paralympics.

Overall, Rukhledev wants to see deaf sport improve , become more visible, grow and develop – competitions like the Deaflympics and Deaf world championships to become more elite.

There needs to be more deaf children and young people involved in sport and he plans to approach UN organisations for funding

The underdevelopment of deaf sport in Africa, South America and the Arabic nations needs to be tackled.

Hopefully by the time of the 100th anniversary things will be much improved.

There is an expectation that Russia will be hosting the 2015 Winter Deaflympics but Rukhledev has not yet got supreme government approval for this event. Russian sponsorship of international sports events normally follows an 8-year bidding process and lead-in, and this is not possible for 2015. The venue is within the oil producing territories of Russia and it appears that organisations in the region have pledged their support for the event. Now all that remains is for ICSD to get Russian government approval which he hopes will be forthcoming now that he has a higher profile as the ICSD President. he anticipates making an announcement on the Winter Deaflympics within two months.

Finally, in response to some of the comments following our last blog, Valery Rukhledev has stated on video that he has no ‘russian mafia’ connections.

Why did you choose Rukhledev ?

Posted on by
5

A few days ago, Valery Rukhledev of Russia narrowly removed Craig Crowley to become the new president of the ICSD. 

It is a bizarre result because Rukhledev made no public commitment of his intentions or vision for the future, so what exactly have people voted for?

Perhaps you voted for Rukhledev and you can explain ? 

I wait to hear from you.

 

 

What are we learning from the Russians?

Posted on by
Reply

Eleven days ago I mentioned the three-way race for the Presidency of the ICSD, for the right to lead the Deaflympic movement for the next four years. 

At the time, we did not have much information from the Russian candidate Valery Rukhledev, that was, until yesterday, when there was a press release announcing that the Russian President Putin had given his support to Valery

Whilst it is  great to see a world leader of Putin’s standing recognise the importance of the Deaflympic games – we must not get  distracted.

We must focus on the real world and the real work at hand. We have an important decision to make and it must be made on the basis of a plan or manifesto that the candidate outlines for their term of office. Since my last blog, Barish has published his promise of “Global Change Through Sports” but, we still have nothing from Rukhledev, all we know is that just like Crowley and to some extent Barish he was an athlete and he has been a  leader for deaf -rights in his home country. But, what about his vision for global sport in relation to Deaf people? 

If you still have not made up your mind who you would vote for, here are the links to the candidates campaigns again.

Craig Crowley (GBR)

Valery Rukhledev (RUS)

Joel Barish (USA)

 

We only have eight days remaining before Congress make their decision, you the public can make your opinions known here. Your influence could make a difference. Let’s hear what you have to say.