We were congratulated. We are still Excluded

Last week, the UK government finally acknowledged Deaflympians in Writing.

In a letter to the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, Sports Minister Stephanie Peacock congratulated the 65 Deaf athletes who represented Great Britain at the Tokyo Deaflympics, praising their “extraordinary talent and resilience” and calling them role models for Deaf children.

Recognition matters. Deaf achievement is often ignored entirely.
But recognition without change is not progress.

When you read the letter closely, it becomes clear that nothing fundamental has shifted.

Fair Play for Deaf Athletes

Praise does not equal equality

Despite the congratulations, Deaflympians are still excluded from the UK’s elite sport system. There is no access to Athlete Performance Awards. No place on the World Class Programme. No consistent funding for coaching, medical support, or performance preparation.

The explanation is the same one Deaf athletes have heard for years.

Deaf sport is governed by the International Committee of Sports for the Deaf, not the International Paralympic Committee. Because of this, Deaflympians are described as sitting “outside UK Sport’s remit”.

This is presented as a neutral technicality. It is not.

It is a decision that keeps Deaf athletes on the outside.

“Outside the remit” means “not designed for Deaf people”

Funding systems are built by people. They show priorities. When a system repeatedly excludes one group, the problem is not the group — it is the setup.

Deaf athletes train at elite level. They compete internationally. They follow anti-doping rules. They represent Great Britain under the flag, just like Olympic and Paralympic athletes.

The difference is not ability or commitment.
The difference is that Deafness does not fit neatly into the boxes the UK already uses.

Instead of redesigning the boxes, the setup asks Deaf athletes to accept exclusion.

Grassroots funding is not the same thing

The Minister’s letter highlights significant grassroots investment through Sport England, including funding for UK Deaf Sport and a specialist inclusion post.

Grassroots funding is important. It helps Deaf people get active and build community sport.

But grassroots funding does not pay for elite training. It does not cover international competition schedules. It does not offer full-time coaching, performance support, or the stability needed to compete against fully funded national systems.

Congratulating Deaf athletes for winning medals while pointing only to participation funding sends a clear message: Deaf sport is welcome at the bottom of the pathway, but not at the top.

We have had meetings before

The letter confirms more meetings. UK Sport will meet Deaf athletes. The Minister is open to further discussion.

Meetings are welcome. Listening matters.

But Deaf athletes and Deaf organisations have already told these stories. Evidence has already been shared. The problem is well understood.

What has been missing is not information.
What has been missing is action.

Without clear outcomes, meetings risk becoming another way to delay decisions while athletes continue to self-fund, self-organise, and self-sacrifice.

This is not about asking for favours

Deaf athletes are not asking for charity.
They are not asking to be “included” as a gesture of goodwill.

They are asking for equal recognition of elite performance.

They train. They compete. They win medals. They represent Britain on the world stage. They inspire Deaf children who rarely see themselves reflected in national sport.

If that is not elite sport, then the definition of elite sport is broken.

The real question

The Government’s letter is polite. It is careful. It avoids conflict.

But it does not answer the central question Deaf athletes are asking.

If Deaflympians are good enough to represent Great Britain,
good enough to win medals,
and good enough to inspire the next generation —

why are they still not good enough to be funded like other elite athletes?

Until that question is answered with real change, congratulations are just words.

You can read the UK Government press release and letter here

#FairPlayForDeafAthletes

Why the Deaflympics Deserves Full Funding: A Call for Equality in Sports

Despite a century of excellence, Deaflympic athletes are still forced to self-fund their participation. It’s time for change.

The Deaflympics Deserve Full Funding and Recognition

The Deaflympics is a world-class sporting event, yet its athletes are forced to self-fund their journey to compete at the highest level. Chris Ratcliffe, CEO of UK Deaf Sport, has highlighted this critical issue in his interview with Matt Taylor for BBC News in the article titled ‘We have to fund the Deaflympics ourselves’, and it is time for the sporting community, corporate sponsors, and government bodies to step up and provide the necessary support. Ratcliffe has been working tirelessly to raise awareness of this issue, and last month, BBC’s Matt Taylor caught up with him to discuss the urgent need for funding and recognition.

Chris Ratcliffe, CEO, UK Deaf Sport “We have to fund the Deaflympics Ourselves”

Photo Credit: © Mark Lomas 2011.

A Century of Excellence, Yet Still Overlooked

As Matt Taylor reported in his BBC News article, for 100 years, the Deaflympics has provided elite deaf athletes with a platform to compete on a level playing field. Established in 1924, it was the first international sporting event for athletes with disabilities, predating the Paralympics by nearly four decades. Despite this rich history, it remains one of the least recognized global sporting competitions. While Olympic and Paralympic athletes receive direct financial support, their Deaflympic counterparts must raise an estimated £4,000 each to represent Great Britain at the upcoming Tokyo games.

This financial burden places deaf athletes at a significant disadvantage. Many are in full-time education or employment while training at an elite level. The additional stress of securing funding detracts from their preparation and undermines their potential to compete at their best.

The Government’s Role in Funding Equity

The UK government, through Sport England, has provided £1.27 million in funding for UK Deaf Sport until 2027. While this is an important step in supporting grassroots initiatives, it does not directly address the financial struggles of athletes preparing for the Deaflympics. As highlighted in Taylor’s article, the exclusion of Deaflympic athletes from UK Sport funding—reserved for Olympic and Paralympic competitors—suggests a misunderstanding of the event’s elite status and its importance to the deaf community.

The time has come for UK Sport and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport to recognize the Deaflympics as an elite-level competition worthy of direct funding. Elite deaf athletes deserve the same financial backing as their Olympic and Paralympic counterparts. This is not just about funding; it is about equality, representation, and the value we place on all athletes, regardless of how they communicate.

Breaking Barriers and Inspiring the Next Generation

Beyond competition, the Deaflympics serves as a vital tool in breaking down barriers for young deaf athletes. As Ratcliffe noted in Taylor’s piece, studies show that deaf children are twice as likely to be inactive compared to their hearing peers. The lack of visibility and investment in deaf sports contributes to this disparity. If we want to create a truly inclusive sporting culture, funding the Deaflympics must be a priority.

UK Deaf Sport’s Destination Deaflympics campaign is a promising initiative to increase awareness, but awareness alone is not enough. If we want young deaf athletes to see the Deaflympics as a viable goal, we must remove financial obstacles. One way to do this is through corporate sponsorships, media partnerships, and a dedicated government-backed funding stream that ensures no athlete is forced to fund their own participation in an event of this magnitude.

UK Deaf Sports Youth engagement programme

A Call to Action

The Deaflympics embodies the very essence of sport: perseverance, excellence, and inclusivity. Yet, as Taylor’s article makes clear, its athletes continue to be sidelined in the funding conversation. It is time for change.

  • Government bodies must formally recognize the Deaflympics as an elite event and provide direct financial support.
  • Corporate sponsors should step up and back our elite deaf athletes, just as they do for Olympians and Paralympians.
  • The media must give the Deaflympics the attention it deserves, ensuring wider public awareness and engagement.

The Deaflympics should not be an event where only those who can afford it get to compete. Every athlete representing Great Britain on the world stage should do so knowing that their country stands behind them—financially, institutionally, and culturally.

It’s time to fund the Deaflympics properly. Anything less is a failure of our commitment to true sporting equality.

For more details on the politics and history of the Deaflympics read “Same Spirit Different Team”